Showing posts with label Sport. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sport. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Setanta Sports closes down

The long-running battle to save Setanta's substantial UK business finally collapsed yesterday as administrator Deloitte moved in and shut down the business. The move triggered the loss of 200 jobs across Setanta's bases in England, Scotland and Wales, while another 19 jobs were shed in Dublin after new media wing Setanta Media was wound up.

But there was a reprieve for the sports giant's Setanta Sports Ireland, which employs 160 locally, and Setanta Sports International, which has 50 staff.

This is how Setanta Sports News closed down yesterday evening at 6.00 p.m.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Setanta to go into administration?

An administrator (probably Deloitte) is expected to be appointed to sports broadcaster Setanta as early as Monday after talks with a white knight investor broke down and the company failed to stump up a £10m payment due to the English Premier League. Setanta strongly denied reports in the UK last night that their talks with US billionaire Len Blavatnik had collapsed due to significant tax liabilities, both in the UK and in Luxembourg.

Setanta employs 200 people in Ireland and the ownership structure here is different to the UK. It is 20% owned by promoter Denis Desmond while the remaining 80% of the company is owned by the parent firm Setanta Sports Holdings Limited. Unlike the parent group, the Irish company made a small profit last year.

Setanta boasts around 1.2 million subscribers — but that is still short of the reported 1.9 million it needs to break even and customer numbers have been hit by the recession. The Premier League will now go ahead and market the three-year rights which Setanta had to 46 UK Live Matches per season from the 2009/2010 season. While BSkyB can purchase some of the matches it cannot buy them all thanks to EU law. ESPN, the sports cable channel owned by Walt Disney, confirmed yesterday it is sitting in the sidelines and will take up the rights if "it makes business sense" in a move that would pitch it against BSkyB. It is understood that Britain's leading football clubs could lose at least €30m if Setanta fails and the League is forced to sell on the 46 games.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

How can Real really afford him?

This morning, Manchester United accepted a monumental bid 0f £80m from Real Madrid for their star Portuguese player, Cristiano Ronaldo. The fee will be a new football transfer world record. The question though is, how can Real Madrid afford to outlay such an amount on a player - especially considering they bought another star, Kaka, on Monday for £56m?

It's a combination of a number of factors: namely, growing match-day revenues, increasingly shrewd and global marketing, healthy commercial income, and a ground-breaking domestic TV deal, which have all catapulted the club to the peak of the Deloitte's Football Money League this year. In fact, they have topped it for the past four straight years. For the 2007/08 season, the club saw its revenue hit £290m. Whilst Real Madrid's 4% revenue growth in 2007/08 was more modest than in preceding years, it meant that across a six year period the club had doubled its annual revenues since 2002.

Matchday revenue has also increased significantly in the past couple of years thanks to the reconfiguring of areas of the club's stadium to increase corporate hospitality capacity and hence revenues.

After the purchase of David Beckham from Manchester United in 2003, Real Madrid cleverly projected their brand into East Asia, on the back of the England star's appeal. Real are targeting the world's best players - who are also the world's most marketable players. In emerging markets fans may swap allegiance, from - for example - Manchester United to Real Madrid, simply because they prefer to support star players rather than clubs. But it is not about Real looking to sell more merchandising in places like China, in fact they would not make a great deal from doing that. They are looking to make money from these signings by maximising their future overseas TV rights.

Since 1997 Spanish clubs have sold their own TV rights individually. Real Madrid signed its latest deal in 2006 - for a reported record 1.1bn euros - with Spanish film and TV company Mediapro for seven seasons of broadcast rights. That works out at a huge 150m euros a year.

But overseas merchandising, domestic and TV rights, and matchday earnings are not Real's only income streams. It also has a number of high profile sponsorship partners - Bwin.com, Adidas, Coca-Cola, Audi, and Spanish beer brand Mahou. An image rights deal with Adidas alone in early 2007 garnered them 762m euros. Another benefit, one that helps attract top name players, is the fact that tax legislation allows their foreign players to pay tax at about 23% for the first five years that they are in the country.

In its latest report, Deloitte said it would be difficult to see anyone topping Real Madrid at the top of the money league next year, but added "it will be interesting to see how the club copes with the loss of the Brand Beckham effect." It appears Real are now answering that question by plugging that gap with the purchases of Kaka and Ronaldo.

Source: BBC

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Paddy Power defies the odds

Bookmaker Paddy Power yesterday reported a 4pc increase in pre-tax profits to €79m for 2008 thanks mainly to growth in its online business. The bookmaker saw profits hold in the face of a sharp downturn and said there would be no job cuts or closures. All its rivals have announced such cuts. On the contrary, chief executive Patrick Kennedy reported that the group is well placed to grow the business as it is now able to secure prime high street retail slots previously closed off to bookmakers.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Football's Richlist

Manchester United have come second in the list of the world's richest clubs, while Real Madrid stay top for the fourth year in a row. Deloitte's Football Money League, based on financial information for the 2007/08 season, features seven English clubs in the top 20 positions. The authors said that United would have been top of the Money League if the pound was still at June 2007 levels. Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool are fifth, sixth and seventh respectively.

"If the exchange rate value of the pound had not depreciated, there would have been nine, rather than seven English clubs in the top 20 and Manchester United would have topped the Money League ahead of Real Madrid," said Dan Jones, partner in the Sports Business Group at Deloitte.

United won the English Premier League and UEFA Champions League in 2008, posting a significant 21% pound-denominated revenue growth. The list had been headed by Manchester United for eight years until Real Madrid deposed them. "Whilst Real Madrid's 4% revenue growth in 2007/08 is more modest than recent years, the club has now doubled its revenues since 2002 and enjoys a lead of 41m euros [£32.5m] over Manchester United," said Mr Jones. "With the club having announced that it is budgeting for revenues of 400m euros in 2008/09, it will be difficult for rivals to replace Real at the top of the Money League next year."

The other English clubs in the top 20 are Tottenham Hotspur (14th), Newcastle United (17th) and Manchester City (20th). All the top 20 clubs represent Europe. Germany and Italy have four clubs each in the top 20, Spain and France have two clubs each.
Fenerbahce became the first Turkish club to enter the top 20 since the creation of the list of the world's richest clubs in 1996/97.

WORLD'S WEALTHIEST CLUBS BY REVENUE:
1) Real Madrid: £289.6m
2) Man Utd: £257.1m
3) Barcelona: £244.4m
4) Bayern Munich: £233.8m
5) Chelsea: £212.9m
6) Arsenal: £209.3m
7) Liverpool: £167m
8) AC Milan: £165.8m
9) AS Roma: £138.9m
10) Inter Milan: £136.9m
Source: Deloitte: 2007/8

Sunday, February 8, 2009

P0rn Again

Despite NBC banning sexually explicit ad content from the Super Bowl broadcast, Comcast somehow goofed with 2:47 left in the game and broadcast a 30-second, X-rated clip—from the adult channel Club Jenna—to about 80,000 subscribers watching the game in the Tucson area. According to The Huffington Post, Comcast suspects the work of hackers.

The company is paying each of its affected customers a $10 refund. Freakonomics asks “How did they decide $10 was the correct amount?”

Furthermore, if $10 is Comcast’s estimation of the damage 30 seconds of porn incurred on the average viewer, should it have paid more to families watching the game with small children, or — since the porn clip interrupted the game right after Larry Fitzgerald’s last touchdown in the game — Cardinals fans? And most importantly, what about the people who enjoy porn? Should they send back the refund — perhaps with an extra dollar or two? :o)

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Scudamore dismisses EPL debt fears

Lord David Triesman, chairman of the Football Association, said in October that English soccer was carrying a combined £3 billion of debt. UK Sports minister Andy Burnham called for measures to ensure debt doesn’t endanger the “very existence of one of our great clubs.” However, Richard Scudamore, the English Premier League’s chief executive officer, said today, "Top English soccer clubs have 'manageable' debt because revenue can be maintained even in the financial crisis". He went onto state, "the level of debt is not a huge concern". About half the debt at the twenty Premier League teams was “soft debt” in the form of loans from owners, who don’t expect to recoup the funds, Scudamore said.

Still, the operators of Manchester United and Liverpool took out loans to fund their purchases. The U.S.-based Glazer family has debt of more than £660 million linked to United following its purchase in 2005. George Gillett and Tom Hicks at Liverpool owe around £300 million after buying the Premier League leader last year. Bearing this in mind, it will be intersting to see if these words come back to haunt Scudamore if a leading club falls victim to the credit crunch.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Manchester United to get new sponsors?

Reports in the English press this morning claim that Korean electrical LG and Saudi Telecom are interested in taking over the sponsorship of Manchester United. United’s current sponsors AIG are in serious financial trouble and have had to be propped up by the American government following the global credit crunch. AIG signed a 56.5 million pound deal in 2006 with the current Premier League and Champions League holders.

Manchester United already have strong links with Saudi Telecom who agreed a five-year deal in August worth £10m for advertising on its website and at Old Trafford. United also sent a team to Saudi Arabia last year on a 'PR trip'. Man United chief executive David Gill denied, at the time, that trip was money-motivated: 'People can level what they want at us, but we're relaxed about that. People don't understand how these decisions are taken.' We will see.

Friday, October 31, 2008

The curse of the footy jersey

No, it's not the title of a cheesy horror movie for hallowe'en. The BBC has a tongue-in-cheek article on its site examining whether sponsoring a football team is a curse which may end up in financial ruin.


"Has the credit crunch produced the best new indicator yet - the tell-tale football shirt sponsorship deal? Just consider the evidence. When Manchester United signed up with AIG two years ago, could the Old Trafford side have foreseen that the US insurance giant would soon be teetering on the edge of financial oblivion? An outcome which can only tarnish the image of the Red Devils, by association. There are uncanny parallels elsewhere. Newcastle United is inexorably linked with the biggest banking failure Britain has seen in 150 years, Northern Rock..."

The full article