Showing posts with label Advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Advertising. Show all posts

Sunday, February 8, 2009

P0rn Again

Despite NBC banning sexually explicit ad content from the Super Bowl broadcast, Comcast somehow goofed with 2:47 left in the game and broadcast a 30-second, X-rated clip—from the adult channel Club Jenna—to about 80,000 subscribers watching the game in the Tucson area. According to The Huffington Post, Comcast suspects the work of hackers.

The company is paying each of its affected customers a $10 refund. Freakonomics asks “How did they decide $10 was the correct amount?”

Furthermore, if $10 is Comcast’s estimation of the damage 30 seconds of porn incurred on the average viewer, should it have paid more to families watching the game with small children, or — since the porn clip interrupted the game right after Larry Fitzgerald’s last touchdown in the game — Cardinals fans? And most importantly, what about the people who enjoy porn? Should they send back the refund — perhaps with an extra dollar or two? :o)

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Call for new advertising rules in the UK

A leading UK heart charity is today calling for a ban on junk food advertising on television before 9pm, claiming manufacturers are exploiting family shows to bombard children. Adverts for foods high in fat, sugar and salt are banned from the screen during children's programmes. But, in a new report published today, the British Heart Foundation (BHF) says as few as one in 20 shows most watched by children is covered by the ban and that most of children's viewing (68.9 per cent) is outside children's programming and around shows such as The X-Factor, Kids do the Funniest Things and the soap Emmerdale.

The report, prepared by the Food Commission for BHF, also claims advertisers have resorted to pressuring 'bewildered' parents with misleading health claims in the battle for a share of the lucrative breakfast cereal and lunchbox market. Companies use 'sophisticated marketing techniques to manipulate parents into thinking they are buying healthy food for their children', it states. 'It is clear that some food companies are preying on parents' concerns actively to market children's food that is high in sugar, fat and salt,' said BHF chief executive Peter Hollins. 'They are manipulating legislative loopholes to find new tactics to entice children and their parents.

The report highlights several products that, it claims, show how parents are manipulated. These include:
  • Kellogg's Coco Pops Cereal and Milk Bars says it is 'the best choice for a lunchbox treat', with images of grapes and wholemeal bread. 'In reality it contains a massive 41g of sugar per 100g and uses adult guideline daily amounts, which could further mislead parents,' says BHF.
  • Dairylea says it has 'no artificial colour, flavours or preservatives added'. 'But just one Dairylea Bite contains nearly a third of a child's daily recommended maximum saturated fat intake.'
  • A Nestlé and Nesquik magazine ad showing children eating Cheerios and sucking milk through a Nesquik flavoured Magic Straw claims to be 'full of goodness' helping to 'maintain strong healthy bones'. Yet with the mix of Cheerios and strawberry-flavoured milk a child 'would consume 37.4g of sugar,' says the report.
  • Burger King Aberdeen Angus Mini-Burgers with Cheese is advertised with a 'warrior' mother saying: 'The lunch battle is over.' Yet there is more than a fifth of a child's daily recommended maximum saturated fat intake in the product.
  • KFC Deluxe Boneless Box TV advert shows children who, after a family meal of KFC, volunteer to do the washing-up. This, says the report, uses the 'emotional insight' technique by sympathising with difficulty in getting offspring to do chores. Yet it says there is more than half of a child's daily recommended maximum salt intake in a serving of Popcorn chicken.
Manufacturers denied the findings. A spokesman for Kraft who produce Dairylea cheese said: "Parents tell us that no artificial ingredients are important to them, so that's what we highlight."

"Call to ban junk food ads during 'family' TV", The Observer, 14.12.2008.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Broadband not as advertised

New research shows broadband subscribers can rarely access the maximum connection speeds advertised by internet service providers. A study on broadband available in Dublin, Cork, Galway and Limerick has found that - on average - consumers benefit from just 60% of advertised speeds.The term 'broadband speeds may vary' - will often be heard in advertisements from internet service providers - but according to new research, those variations can be as much as 60% off the stated maximums!

This report - by the Epitiro internet monitoring firm - finds that fixed line subscribers receive on average 60% of the bandwidth speed being advertised , with mobile users faring slightly better at an average of 64%. Overall, Smart Telecom was deemed to be the best of the providers surveyed, followed by BT Ireland and Digiweb.

In related news, it was reported on Tuesday that contracts will be signed next week on the long-delayed national broadband scheme to provide service to outlying areas, but it will still be another 22 months before the system is operational, the Dáil has been told.

Friday, October 31, 2008

The curse of the footy jersey

No, it's not the title of a cheesy horror movie for hallowe'en. The BBC has a tongue-in-cheek article on its site examining whether sponsoring a football team is a curse which may end up in financial ruin.


"Has the credit crunch produced the best new indicator yet - the tell-tale football shirt sponsorship deal? Just consider the evidence. When Manchester United signed up with AIG two years ago, could the Old Trafford side have foreseen that the US insurance giant would soon be teetering on the edge of financial oblivion? An outcome which can only tarnish the image of the Red Devils, by association. There are uncanny parallels elsewhere. Newcastle United is inexorably linked with the biggest banking failure Britain has seen in 150 years, Northern Rock..."

The full article